Current practice on perioperative opioid titration and clinician-perceived predictors for dose escalation in adults, a Danish nation-wide survey 

Trang XM Tran1, BSc Med., BA Psych. (project manager/driver)

Mik Wetterslev2, MD, PhD (conceptualisation, survey setup in RedCap)

Ole Mathiesen3,4, MD, PhD, Representing Chair Professor (pain expert opinion)

Anders K Nørskov3,4, MD, PhD, Ass. Professor (identification of site investigators via CEPRA)

Christian S Meyhoff1, MD, PhD, Professor (co-supervisor)

Theis Itenov1, MD, PhD, Associate Professor (formal supervisor)

Anders PH Karlsen1, MD, PhD (conceptualisation, primary supervisor)

1 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen.

2 Department of Intensive Care 4131, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen.

3 Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital Koege.

4 The Collaboration for Evidence-based Practice & Research in Anaesthesia (CEPRA)

 

Introduction 

Opioids hold a fundamental role in perioperative pain management, both as part of multimodal analgesia and as first line treatment in patients who experience breakthrough pain after surgery.1,2 Their use must be balanced to provide sufficient analgesia while avoiding opioid-related adverse events.3–7 While equipotent doses of some opioids provide comparable analgesia and adverse event profiles, each opioid possesses distinct pharmacodynamic properties, rendering them more or less suitable for different surgical populations or phases in the perioperative course.8,9 The evidence on how demographic and surgical factors impact individual opioid needs in the perioperative setting is very limited.10,11 Currently, no evidence-based guidelines exist on how to titrate opioids for the surgical patient during the intra- and postoperative phase based on easily obtainable factors such as: age, gender, weight, perioperative anxiety, type of surgery, and surgical complications.11–16 Therefore, clinicians must resort to their own clinical experience, local guidelines and expert-opinion guidelines, when choosing intra- and postoperative opioid doses.10,11,17

 

We have reason to believe that local guidelines differ between hospitals - and when this is combined with clinicians dosing based on their prior experiences and/or expert-opinions – there occurs a variability in opioid-dosages administered to the same type of patients.  An explorative survey of current practice in opioid dosing strategies will provide important information on variability in opioid dosing in relation to patient predictors. These insights can be used to template future clinical trials with the aim of streamlining and optimising opioid dosing.19

 

Aim

We aim to assess clinician-perceived predictors for escalating intra- and postoperative use of opioids in adults among anesthesia nurses, PACU nurses and anesthesiologists. We hypothesize that there is a significant inter-clinician, inter-personnel group, and inter-hospital heterogeneity concerning the selection of opioids and dosages.

 

Methods 

Design: We plan to perform a nation-wide online survey. Participation is voluntary without financial compensation, which will be stated in the invitation. We will consider activation and completion of the survey link as informed consent. The survey will be distributed and collected in the period from 01.02.24 to 31.04.24. The protocol and manuscript will be prepared according to the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS).21

Population: Anesthesiologists, anesthesia nurses and PACU nurses in Danish public hospitals.

Survey details: The survey will address current practice in perioperative opioid administration at participating sites, i.e., 1) opioids administered intraoperatively to prevent postoperative pain and 2) opioids administered in PACU for patients who have developed pain despite receiving preventive multimodal analgesia. The survey will consist of 8 questions regarding intraoperative opioid dosing and 8 questions regarding postoperative opioid titration – completable within 7-8 minutes for nurses and slightly longer for anaesthesiologists who have to answer both intra- and postoperative questions. Participants will be requested to describe their typical selection of opioids (e.g., first choice drug, second choice etc., and specific choice of opioids for specific patient co-morbidities or types of surgery). We will create a list of potential predictors for escalation of dose titration. Participants will be asked to rate how they perceive the influence of these potential predictors on required opioid doses. Participants will be able to add other potential predictors not listed by the authors. The survey will include a clinical case designed to assess how various patient characteristics and surgical factors impact participant’s dose administration. Data will be transferred directly into REDcap.

The survey will be pilot-tested and revised in three independent rounds by two anesthesia nurses, two PACU nurses and two anesthesiologists – different persons and hospitals each time. The second and third pilot-round and the final survey will be designed in the secure web application Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)20

Population and recruitment: We will include participants from all 40 public departments of anesthesia at Danish hospitals. We aim to recruit all anesthesia nurses, PACU nurses and anesthesiologists working with perioperative pain management. We aim to reach a response rate of 70% of identified potential participants.23

Identification of eligible participants, survey distribution and optimised response rates: From each department, we will recruit a local site investigator, preferably anesthesiologists participating in the perioperative research network Collaboration for Evidence-based Practice and Research in Anesthesia (CEPRA).22 Site investigators will be responsible for identifying all eligible participants at their department and distribute the survey via a standardized email with an online link. Site investigators will be asked to send a minimum of three e-mail reminders to all participating sites with low participation rates (<70%). Site investigators will receive an acknowledgement in the scientific publication.

Statistics: We will present data descriptively. Continuous data will be presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs); and categorical data presented as numbers and percentages.
The proportion of missing data will be reported, and all analyses will be conducted as complete-case analyses. In four clinical cases, the survey will provide answers regarding clinician’s specific choice of opioid drugs and dosages. All statistical analyses will be performed in the statistical software R.24 As we use a convenience sample, no formal sample size estimation will be performed. We will explore local response rates to ensure the surveys representativity.

Ethical considerations: Participants are anonymous and data are secured by using REDCap. Participants will be asked for consent in the first survey question. The research project has been locally approved by the The Legal Section, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital.


References

  1. Gasbjerg KS, Hägi-Pedersen D, Lunn TH, et al. Effect of dexamethasone as an analgesic adjuvant to multimodal pain treatment after total knee arthroplasty: randomised clinical trial. The BMJ. 2022;376. doi:10.1136/bmj-2021-067325
  2. Thybo KH, Hägi-Pedersen D, Dahl JB, et al. Effect of Combination of Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) and Ibuprofen vs Either Alone on Patient-Controlled Morphine Consumption in the First 24 Hours after Total Hip Arthroplasty: The PANSAID Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. 2019;321(6):562-571. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.22039
  3. Dahl JB, Nielsen R V., Wetterslev J, et al. Post-operative analgesic effects of paracetamol, NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, gabapentinoids and their combinations: A topical review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58(10):1165-1181. doi:10.1111/aas.12382
  4. Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet. 2003;362(9399):1921-1928. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14966-5
  5. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248(2):189-198. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a
  6. Benyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, et al. Opioid Complications and Side Effects. Pain Physician. 2008;2s;11(3;2s):S105-S120. doi:10.36076/ppj.2008/11/S105
  7. Zhao SZ, Chung F, Hanna DB, Raymundo AL, Cheung RY, Chen C. Dose-response relationship between opioid use and adverse effects after ambulatory surgery. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004;28(1):35-46. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.11.001
  8. Cuvillon P, Alonso S, L’Hermite J, et al. Post‐operative opioid‐related adverse events with intravenous oxycodone compared to morphine: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021;65(1):40-46. doi:10.1111/aas.13685
  9. Dinges HC, Otto S, Stay DK, et al. Side Effect Rates of Opioids in Equianalgesic Doses via Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(4):1153-1162. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000003887
  10. Aubrun F, Mazoit JX, Riou B. Postoperative intravenous morphine titration. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(2):193-201. doi:10.1093/bja/aer458
  11. Papadomanolakis-Pakis N, Uhrbrand P, Haroutounian S, Nikolajsen L. Prognostic prediction models for chronic postsurgical pain in adults: a systematic review. Pain. 2021;162(11):2644-2657. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002261
  12. Aubrun F, Zahr N, Langeron O, et al. Opioid-related genetic polymorphisms do not influence postoperative opioid requirement. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;35(7):496-504. doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000000793
  13. Verwoerd MJ, Wittink H, Maissan F, van Kuijk SMJ, Smeets RJEM. A study protocol for the validation of a prognostic model with an emphasis on modifiable factors to predict chronic pain after a new episode of acute- or subacute nonspecific idiopathic, non-traumatic neck pain presenting in primary care. PLoS One. 2023;18(1):e0280278. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0280278
  14. De Gregori M, Diatchenko L, Ingelmo PM, et al. Human Genetic Variability Contributes to Postoperative Morphine Consumption. Journal of Pain. 2016;17(5):628-636. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2016.02.003
  15. Khalil H, Sereika SM, Dai F, et al. OPRM1 and COMT Gene–Gene Interaction Is Associated With Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption After Orthopedic Trauma. Biol Res Nurs. 2017;19(2):170-179. doi:10.1177/1099800416680474
  16. Yang MMH, Hartley RL, Leung AA, et al. Preoperative predictors of poor acute postoperative pain control: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9(4). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025091
  17. Tveita T, Thoner J, Klepstad P, Dale O, Jystad Å, Borchgrevink PC. A controlled comparison between single doses of intravenous and intramuscular morphine with respect to analgesic effects and patient safety. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(7):920-925. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01608.x
  18. Gan TJ, Lubarsky DA, Flood EM, et al. Patient preferences for acute pain treatment. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92(5):681-688. doi:10.1093/bja/aeh123
  19. Laigaard J, Pedersen C, Rønsbo TN, Mathiesen O, Karlsen APH. Minimal clinically important differences in randomised clinical trials on pain management after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126(5):1029-1037. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.021
  20. Patridge EF, Bardyn TP. Research electronic data capture (REDCap). Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2018;106(1):142-144. doi:10.5195/jmla.2018.319
  21. Sharma A, Minh Duc NT, Luu Lam Thang T, et al. A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(10):3179-3187. doi:10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1
  22. Nørskov AK, Jakobsen JC, Afshari A, et al. Collaboration for Evidence-based Practice and Research in Anaesthesia (CEPRA): A consortium initiative for perioperative research. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023;67(6):804-810. doi:10.1111/aas.14235
  23. Burns KEA, Duffett M, Kho ME, et al. A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. CMAJ Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2008;179(3):245-252. doi:10.1503/cmaj.080372
  24. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Published 2013. Accessed September 13, 2023. https://www.r-project.org